Today I taught my first “trumpet
lesson” (Prof. Brandt Schneider was my guinea pig) in front of my class. Before
I came in, I knew exactly what I wanted to say, and exactly what I wanted to
cover – I was definitely prepared to cover the first five minutes (the
direction for the assignment.) Mr. Schneider certainly did his part to act in
the role of a fifth grade boy, which was okay, because of course as educators
we must be prepared for all sorts! A couple of things did throw me off
momentarily. I was not planning on even opening the trumpet case within the
first five minutes but we ended up taking a peek inside. But this was fine! We
must be flexible and accommodate all of our students’ questions, especially during
the first lesson when they are most eager and excited. I had no problem having
Mr. Schneider open up the case so I can explain the mouthpiece to him. We may
or may not have engaged in too much small talk – it is hard to gauge because
the actual lesson would have been 35 minutes long, but we were only covering
the first five. I thought it went well, overall.
Did my objective match what the student believed the
objective was? I’d have to answer yes – I made sure to explain that all the
exercises we were about to do pave the way to producing a sound out of his
instrument, which was the goal of my lesson. The student knew he would
eventually be producing a quality sound, and I was showing him how to get that
done.
As far as talking vs. listening goes, I was definitely
doing most of the talking, which in my opinion is perfectly fine for a first
lesson. The first lesson for anything should be more teacher-centered so we can
explain all classroom procedures and policies, and to gain the trust of the
student by telling him about myself. Perhaps I could have done more listening?
This would have definitely been the case as the lesson progressed, as I would
have been allowing the student to explore the sounds on the mouthpiece.
I wanted Mr. Schneider to be able to get through at least
one of my initial breathing exercises within the first five minutes.
Unfortunately, this did not happen – the timer expired as I was just getting
into it. But I am not too worried about that as I progress – I know fully well
that we would be covering it within the first lesson, and that ultimately he
would have walked away from the lesson with everything he needed to produce a
sound. I am confident in that, and I will gain even more confidence the more I
proceed along this path. This was a very helpful experience for me!
Glad you feel like you did well in your planning and execution. Great point about being flexible, when you ended up showing the "student" the trumpet when you hadn't planned to in the first five minutes.
ReplyDeleteI agree, procedures and policies seemed to be an important aspect that Mr. Schneider brought up after we had all gone, and I didn't think of them too much in the first five minutes assuming I would have after an initial introduction.
I've taught many first lessons on cello in the past, and typically I'd get to know the student and ask their background in music and then describe what we'll be doing.